Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Nelson Romero v. Kail, et al
as 14-10500
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NELSON ROMERO, also known as Ritchord Romero
Defendant - Appellee:
NFN KAIL, Bus Driver, DR. NFN CHAVEZ, DR. JUDITH L. THOMAS and others
Romero v. Kail et al
as 2:2014cv00034
Plaintiff:
Nelson Romero
Defendant:
NFN Kail, NFN Chavez, Judith L. Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Romero v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2013cv00098
Petitioner:
Nelson Romero
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Romero v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 2:2013cv00052
Petitioner:
Nelson Romero
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Romero v. Royal Celebration Inn
as 6:2009cv00988
Plaintiff:
Nelson Romero and Nelson Romero
Defendant:
Royal Celebration Inn
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
McClendon, et al v. City of Albuquerque, et al
as 09-2095
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JIMMY MCCLENDON, AKA Billy McClendon, HAROLD LUND, PETER SUMATKAKU and others
Plaintiff-Intervenor - Appellee:
EM, RL, WA and others
Defendant - Appellant:
BERNALILLO COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS and RON TORRES, Warden, Bernalillo County Metropolitan Detention Center
Defendant:
CITY OF ALBUQUERQUE, MARTIN CHAVEZ, Mayor of Albuquerque, BERNALILLO COUNTY and others
Romero v. Quarterman
as 08-10015
Petitioner - Appellant:
NELSON ROMERO
Respondent - Appellee:
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
McClendon, et al v. Albuquerque, City of, et al
as 6:1995cv00024
Plaintiff:
Peter Sumatkaku , Marc A Gillette , George Chavez and others
Defendant:
Albuquerque, City of , Martin Chavez , Bernalillo, County of and others
Intervenor_plaintiff:
EM , RL , WA and others
Movant:
Dennis F. Barela
Miscellaneou:
Alan C. Torgerson
Intervenor:
AFSCME Local 2499
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
