Cases 11 - 20 of 22
WHIT NIP HOLDINGS, LLC v. SHOWTIME MANAGEMENT AUS PTY LTD
as 2:2020cv00078
Defendant:
SHOWTIME MANAGEMENT AUS PTY LTD
Plaintiff:
WHIT NIP HOLDINGS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Altinel et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11896
Plaintiff:
Agnes Leonard, Mary Gleeson, Jing Fang Zhang and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
ETHEARD v. TOWNSHIP OF BLOOMFIELD et al
as 2:2018cv14339
Plaintiff:
DEROTY ETHEARD
Defendant:
BLOOMFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT, TOWNSHIP OF BLOOMFIELD, ANN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cummings v. Nip et al
as 3:2016cv00256
Plaintiff:
Victor Cummings
Defendant:
Jeff Nip and Hardin County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Strataluz LLC v. Nip Fab Limited et al
as 8:2015cv00749
Defendant:
Does, Nip Fab Limited and Ulta Salon Cosmetics & Fragrance Inc
Plaintiff:
Strataluz, LLC
General Agency Services, Inc. v. NIP Group. Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00340
Defendant:
NIP Group, Inc. , Michael Rook , Genevieve Mortell and others
Plaintiff:
General Agency Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01065
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Notice Only Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE MIDWEST v. NIP GROUP, INC.
as 2:2011cv01621
Plaintiff:
HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE MIDWEST
Defendant:
NIP GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nip v. PNC Bank, N.A.
as 4:2010cv04667
Defendant:
PNC Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Richard Kam Man Nip
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Yates v. McAtee et al
as 3:2010cv00673
Plaintiff:
Twila Yates
Defendant:
Richard A. McAtee , Nip Kelley Trucking Company, Inc. and Sihua Wen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
