Cases 11 - 20 of 60
Paulina Medina v. OfficeMax, Inc. et al
as 5:2014cv03693
Plaintiff:
Paulina Medina
Defendant:
OfficeMax, Inc. and Officemax North America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dok Solution LLC v. FKA Distributung Co. et al
as 8:2014cv01910
Plaintiff:
Dok Solution LLC
Defendant:
FKA Distributung Co. , Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc., Best Buy Co. of Minnesota, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Pi-Net International, Inc. v. Officemax, Inc.
as 2:2013cv01027
Plaintiff:
Pi-Net International, Inc.
Defendant:
Officemax, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00763
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Arunachalam v. OfficeMax Inc
as 2:2013cv00599
Plaintiff:
Lakshmi Arunachalam
Defendant:
OfficeMax Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
United States ex rel. John Doe v. Staples, Inc., et al
as 13-7071
Plaintiff - Appellant:
United States ex rel. John Doe
Defendant - Appellee:
Staples, Inc., Officemax Inc., Target Corp. and others
LYAUTEY et al v. ALFA LAVAL, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv84922
Defendant:
STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION, ELLIOTT TURBOMACHINERY COMPANY, INC., STONE and others
Plaintiff:
GALE LYAUTEY and PATRICIA LYAUTEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv04049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Garrie v. A I U Insurance Co et al
as 2:2012cv01615
Defendant:
Texaco Inc , Rockwell Automation Inc , American Centennial Insurance Co and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Canatelo, LLC v. Officemax, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv01392
Plaintiff:
Canatelo, LLC
Defendant:
Officemax, Inc. , OfficeMax North America, Inc. , OfficeMax Puerto Rico, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
