Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Uzzelle v. Gardner
as 5:2022ct03440
Plaintiff:
Timothy L. Uzzelle
Defendant:
Officer Gardner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clayton v. GEO Group Private Contractor et al
as 3:2022cv50364
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Clayton
Defendant:
GEO Group Private Contractor, Officer Gardner, Secretary Vendella and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hemphill v. Department of Public Safety et al
as 5:2022ct03310
Plaintiff:
Scott Devon Hemphill
Defendant:
Department of Public Safety, Officer Gardner and Unknown Correctional Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brett v. Trump et al
as 1:2021cv01383
Defendant:
John Thents, Mr. Brenichre, Carl Thume and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Brett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Napoleon Rankin Bey v. Correctional Officer Singleton
as 21-6705
Defendant / Appellee:
SHIRLEY BENNETT, HALLOWAY, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER HENDERSON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NAPOLEON J. RANKIN BEY
Kayie Wright v. Johnny Hawkins
as 21-6050
Defendant / Appellee:
GILLIO, JOHN DOE, Maintenance Worker, JANE DOE, Psychiatrist, Central Prison and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KAYIE SHAUNE WRIGHT
Joyner v. Unknown Defendants
as 5:2020ct03315
Defendant:
Unknown Defendants, Officer Brown, Bryon T. Harris and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Joyner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Hawkins et al
as 5:2020ct03137
Defendant:
Officer Greene, Alfreda Threat, Officer Applewhite and others
Plaintiff:
Kayie Shaune Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EMMETT v. DEPARTMENT OF PAROLE AND PROBATION et al
as 1:2019cv00573
Defendant:
Sgt. Beckley, Shannon, -, Robert Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Tammy Marie Emmett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Lashbrook et al
as 3:2018cv01692
Defendant:
H. Johnson, Jacqueline Lashbrook, Cody Wilson and others
Plaintiff:
Robert M. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
