Cases 11 - 20 of 22,444
McKinnon v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 3:2024cv00478
Plaintiff:
Henry Oliver McKinnon, III
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ferguson Sr. v. Oliver et al
as 1:2024cv02097
Plaintiff:
King B.M. Ferguson Sr. and Blaane A. Oteo
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver, Charles Mims, Richard Timothy Hamil and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
OLIVER v. OLIVER
as 1:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Anthony J Oliver
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
Cruz v. Oliver, et al.
as 24-3013
Petitioner:
CARIM CRUZ
Respondent:
RONALD OLIVER, Substituted in Place of William Hutching per [40] Order., ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA and WILLIAM HUTCHINGS, Substituted by Ronald Oliver per [40] Order.
Cobble et al v. Biden et al
as 1:2024cv02044
Plaintiff:
David Cobble and American Citizens
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Brad Raffensperger, Alexander Soros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Oliver et al v. Speedway
as 1:2024cv00446
Plaintiff:
Ashley Oliver and Robert Oliver
Defendant:
Speedway doing business as Speedway LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
ALLEN v. OLIVER
as 7:2024cv00046
Petitioner:
MONALETA D ALLEN
Respondent:
TYRONE OLIVER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Oliver v. Mackey et al
as 2:2024cv00275
Plaintiff:
Cherryl Oliver
Defendant:
Eric Mackey and James Ward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Oliver v. State of Alabama (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Michael Darnell Oliver
Defendant:
State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
