Cases 11 - 20 of 211
Stone v. Carr et al
as 1:2022cv00126
Plaintiff:
Eric Alexander Stone
Defendant:
David Quinn, Christopher Brasher, Ural D. Glainville and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stone v. Carr et al
as 4:2022cv00004
Plaintiff:
Eric Alexander Stone
Defendant:
David Quinn, Christopher Brasher, Ural D. Glainville and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCONNELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv59620
Plaintiff:
PAUL HOWARD MCCONNELL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gardner et al v. Bottoms et al
as 1:2021cv02798
Plaintiff:
Mark Gardner, Lonnie Hood and Ivory Streeter
Defendant:
Keisha Lance Bottoms, Paul Howard and Erika Shields
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01813
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Kidron Flavor v. Harold Melton, et al
as 21-11259
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KIDRON ISRAEL FLAVOR
Defendant / Appellee:
TERRELL DARK, THEODORE JACKSON, HAROLD D. MELTON, Chief Justice, Supreme Court of Georgia and others
Jermaine Spence v. State of Georgia ex rel., et al
as 21-10654
Petitioner / Appellant:
JERMAINE E. SPENCE
Defendant / Appellee:
PAUL HOWARD and STATE OF GEORGIA EX REL.
Wymer v. Howard et al
as 1:2021cv00689
Defendant:
Atlanta Police and Paul Howard
Plaintiff:
James Wymer
Respondent:
Sheriff Patrick Labat
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Flavor v. Melton et al
as 1:2021cv00281
Defendant:
Sheriff Theodore Jackson, Attorney Terrell Dark, Harold D. Melton and others
Plaintiff:
Kidron Israel Flavor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOWARD v. MCDOUGLE et al
as 1:2020cv01180
Defendant:
C/O BURKE, C/O GIBSON, C/O EDWARDS and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH PAUL HOWARD, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
