Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Yao v. City of Folsom, et al.
as 2:2016cv02609
Plaintiff:
Jing Jing Yao
Defendant:
City of Folsom , Folsom Police Department , Scott Geist and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Estate of John Paul Rice Sr et al
as 2:2016cv02235
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Estate of John Paul Rice Sr, John Paul Rice, Jr, Nic Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. Rice
as 2:2016mc50281
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Paul Rice
Hammond et al v. JBRE LLC et al
as 8:2015cv01568
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hammond , Jerry Albright and Paul Rice
Defendant:
JBRE LLC , JBRE FL LLC and JBRE NV LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Paul Rice v. John Pate
as 15-6485
Petitioner - Appellant:
PAUL ANTHONY RICE, a/k/a Paul Rice
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN JOHN PATE
Rice v. Hauser et al
as 7:2010cv02494
Plaintiff:
James Paul Rice
Defendant:
Mark S Hauser , Spartanburg Sports Media LLC , WSPG and others
Counter_claimant:
Spartanburg Sports Media LLC and Mark S Hauser
Counter_defendant:
James Paul Rice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Paul Rice et al v. Charles Schwab et al
as 8:2010cv00398
Defendant:
Charles Schwab, DOES, Moodys Investors Services Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Rice and Paul Rice
Daniels v. City of Folsom et al
as 2:2010at00323
Plaintiff:
Micheal Jonathon Daniels
Defendant:
City of Folsom, Andrea Chapman, Sam Spiegel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daniels v. City of Folsom et al
as 2:2010cv00630
Plaintiff:
Micheal Jonathon Daniels
Defendant:
City of Folsom, Andrea Chapman, Sam Spiegel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rice v. Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP et al
as 6:2009cv17257
Defendant:
Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP and Astrazeneca LP
Plaintiff:
Paul Rice and Paul Rice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
