Cases 11 - 20 of 48
CAPORICCI U.S.A. CORP. v. PRADA S.p.A. et al
as 1:2018cv20859
Plaintiff:
CAPORICCI U.S.A. CORP.
Defendant:
PRADA S.p.A. , GNP PELLI DI PEZZOLI GIAN ANDREA and DONALD FARMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
USA v. Pelly et al
as 5:2017cv00201
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
David Pelly, Unknown Spouse of David Pelly , Central Kentucky Management Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
PELLY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2017cv00168
Respondent:
J. E. KRUEGER
Petitioner:
MARIO PELLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pelli et al v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local No. 43 et al
as 5:2017cv00060
Plaintiff:
Frank A. Pelli, Sr. , David M. Brescia and Thomas E. Kane
Defendant:
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local No. 43, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Central and Northern New York Building and Trades Council, AFL-CIO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mario Pelly v. USA
as 16-3480
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARIO PELLY
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Mario Pelly v. USA
as 16-2946
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARIO PELLY
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Pelly v. USA
as 3:2016cv00675
Petitioner:
Mario Pelly
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Pellis v. Hobbs et al
as 1:2016cv04023
Plaintiff:
Charles Pellis
Defendant:
Hobbs, Padgett and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. A Temporary Right to Enter Upon Land in DeKalb County, Alabama et al
as 4:2016cv00686
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
A Temporary Right to Enter Upon Land in DeKalb County, Alabama, Kathy Diane Jernigan Pelly, Cassandra Alain Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 831
Adami v. Republic of Argentina
as 15-3612
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Anna Storchi, Filippo Bagolin, Celestino Goglia and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Republic of Argentina
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
