Cases 11 - 20 of 56
REEDER v. TAYLOR et al
as 1:2023cv00528
Plaintiff:
MARC BEREN REEDER
Defendant:
TASHA TAYLOR, BRETT WITTER, MARK MCCLEESE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Lacy v. Adult Probation Department et al
as 3:2022cv00823
Plaintiff:
Adrian Eugene Lacy and Adrian Lacy
Defendant:
Adult Probation Department and Michigan City Superior Court 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burress v. Taylor et al
as 2:2022cv00169
Plaintiff:
Arliss B Burress
Defendant:
Stephanie Taylor and Probation Dept
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neal v. Lake County Courts et al
as 2:2022cv00001
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Neal
Defendant:
Lake County Courts, Lake County Probation Department, Judge Lesenger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CABLE v. HOLCOMB et al
as 1:2022cv00018
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JAMES CABLE
Defendant:
ERIC HOLCOMB, INDIANA GOVERNOR'S OFFICE, INDIANA ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
M. v. KINCAID et al
as 2:2021cv00478
Plaintiff:
K. M.
Defendant:
MATTHEW KINCAID and VIGO COUNTY PROBATE COURT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FARMER v. HAMMOND POLICE et al
as 1:2021cv01636
Plaintiff:
JEREMIAH S. FARMER
Defendant:
CHRISTISON, ANTHONY ADAMS, DANIAL MITTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pratt v. LaPorte County of et al
as 3:2021cv00360
Plaintiff:
Robert Omar Pratt, Jr and Rev. Robert Pratt, Jr
Defendant:
Robert Hagler, Holt, Allen W Ott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUBBARD v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2021cv00210
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MARION, MARION COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT, COURTNEY and others
Plaintiff:
BYRON HUBBARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUBBARD v. COUNTY OF MARION et al
as 1:2020cv03300
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MARION, JANE DOE, COURTNEY and others
Plaintiff:
BYRON HUBBARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
