Cases 11 - 20 of 91
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv04340
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Hood et al v. Singh et al
as 6:2020cv00016
Plaintiff:
Nichole R Hood, Kirstan Bennett, Kylie Bennett and others
Defendant:
Angrej Singh and EK Carriers Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hood et al v. Singh et al
as 5:2019cv01159
Plaintiff:
Nichole R Hood, Kirstan Bennett, Kylie Bennett and others
Defendant:
EK Carriers Inc and Angrej Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brown v. Rose et al
as 1:2018cv03505
Plaintiff:
Glenn Brown
Defendant:
Robin Rose, Dr. Marshall E. James, Dr. He Yuan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hood, Sr. v. Lamb et al
as 3:2017cv00955
Plaintiff:
Curtis R Hood, Sr.
Defendant:
Nicholas R. Lamb, Lt. Bach, Lt. Ochs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Julian Hood, Jr. v. OPM
as 17-1417
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JULIAN R. HOOD, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
Julian Hood, Jr. v. USPS, et al
as 17-1405
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JULIAN R. HOOD, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, MICHIGAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION, WESTERN MICHIGAN AREA LOCAL #281, also named as Michigan Postal Worker Union, Western Michigan Area Local #281 and AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION, AFL-CIO
Julian Hood, Jr. v. USPS, et al
as 17-1406
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JULIAN R. HOOD, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, MEGAN J. BRENNAN, Postmaster General, in her individual and professional capacity, MARYL R. ROSEN, USPS Attorney, in her individual and professional capacity and others
Julian Hood, Jr. v. USPS, et al
as 17-1404
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JULIAN R. HOOD, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and MEGAN J. BRENNAN, Postmaster General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-1407
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
