Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Craig Coley v. Ventura County, et al
as 2:2018cv10385
Plaintiff:
Coley Craig and Craig Coley
Defendant:
Deputy Taylor, County of Ventura, Norma Fort and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kerr v. Bard et al
as 2:2018cv01822
Defendant:
Davol Inc., and C.R. Bard
Plaintiff:
Robert Kerr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KERR v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2018cv14338
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. ("IMERYS TALC") and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
ROBERT KERR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KERR v. DEPARTMENT OF STATE et al
as 1:2017cv00755
Plaintiff:
ROBERT KERR
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF STATE, LAURIE FULTON and STEPHEN CRISTINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dudley v. Kerr
as 1:2016cv02816
Plaintiff:
Pamela Dudley
Defendant:
Robert Kerr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kerr v. Vestas-American Wind Technology, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv01355
Plaintiff:
Robert Kerr
Defendant:
Vestas-American Wind Technology, Inc., Vestas Wind Systems A/S and Everpower Wind Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kerr v. Vestas-American Wind Technology, Inc. et al
as 1:2015at00730
Plaintiff:
Robert Kerr
Defendant:
Vestas-American Wind Technology, Inc., Vestas Wind Systems A/S and Everpower Wind Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sue Doe v. Linda Kidd
as 15-1026
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SUE DOE
Defendant - Appellee:
LINDA KIDD, STAN BUTKUS, KATHI LACY and others
Party-in-Interest:
SANDRA RAY
Sue Doe v. Linda Kidd
as 15-1022
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SUE DOE
Defendant - Appellee:
LINDA KIDD, STAN BUTKUS, KATHI LACY and others
Party-in-Interest:
SANDRA RAY
Sue Doe v. Linda Kidd
as 15-1024
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SUE DOE
Defendant - Appellant:
LINDA KIDD, STAN BUTKUS, KATHI LACY and others
Party-in-Interest:
SANDRA RAY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
