Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Bacon v. Beard et al
as 3:2015cv04477
Plaintiff:
Ronald Franklin Bacon
Defendant:
Jeffery Beard, W. Muniz, Kumar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Windham v. Ronald Franklin, et al
as 14-56258
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES W. WINDHAM
Defendant - Appellee:
RONALD FRANKLIN, Prison Guard Sergeant, individually, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR), PAGAN, C. SPENCER and others
Charles Windham v. Ronald Franklin, et al
as 14-55820
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES W. WINDHAM
Defendant - Appellee:
RONALD FRANKLIN, Prison Guard Sergeant, individually, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR), PAGAN, C. SPENCER and others
Charles Windham v. Ronald Franklin et al
as 2:2013cv03004
Defendant:
Ms Assad, Miguel Enriquez, Ronald Franklin and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Windham
Metropoliatan Life Insurance Company v. Franklin et al
as 2:2012cv15591
Defendant:
Ronald Franklin, Jr., Patricia Lowe and Beta Capital Corp.
Plaintiff:
Metropoliatan Life Insurance Company
Cross_claimant:
Beta Capital Corp.
Cross_defendant:
Beta Capital Corp.
FRANKLIN v. WINGARD et al
as 2:2012cv06239
Petitioner:
RONALD FRANKLIN
Respondent:
TREVOR WINGARD and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2011cv00282
Plaintiff:
Ronald Franklin Harris
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
USA v. Ronald Barne
as 10-12029
Plaintiff - Appellee:
USA
Defendant - Appellant:
RONALD FRANKLIN BARNES
Garland R Baker v. D K Downs, et al
as 2:2003cv04524
:
, , and others
Defendant:
Aaron Berquist, Victoria Chagnon, Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cochrane v. Scutt
as 2:2009cv11963
Petitioner:
Ronald Franklin Cochrane
Respondent:
Debra Scutt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
