Cases 11 - 20 of 64
ROSAS v. CIRCLE K STORES, INC.
as 1:2023cv00070
Plaintiff:
NEYZA ROSAS
Defendant:
CIRCLE K STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
DIAZ FLORES v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv02239
Plaintiff:
ROSA M DIAZ FLORES
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY and KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
ROSA v. WONDER et al
as 2:2022cv00419
Plaintiff:
RAFAEL ROSA, III
Defendant:
WONDER, MOREHEAD, WRIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FIRST CHICAGO INSURANCE COMPANY v. DEIVY ROSAS RAMOS, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00800
Plaintiff:
FIRST CHICAGO INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
DEIVY ROSAS RAMOS, LLC and WAGLER CUSTOM HOMES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
ROSA v. WEXFORD et al
as 2:2022cv00078
Plaintiff:
RAFAEL ROSA, III
Defendant:
WEXFORD, WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, MARTINEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. TSU-MA, Inc.
as 3:2021cv00864
Plaintiff:
Alberto Rosas Garcia
Defendant:
TSU-MA, INC. d/b/a LUX CAFE and TSU-MA, Inc. doing business as Lux Cafe
BONILLAS v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2021cv00135
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL, LLC, COOK INCORPORATED, WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS and others
Plaintiff:
ROSA BONILLAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rosas v. USA
as 1:2020cv00325
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Jorge Rosas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Cavalier Transportation Services Inc v. Aguirre et al
as 3:2020cv00703
Defendant:
ROSAS TRANSPORTS, LLC, DENIS AGUIRRE and Rosas Transports LLC
Plaintiff:
CAVALIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC. and Cavalier Transportation Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROSA v. IDOC et al
as 1:2020cv01929
Defendant:
A. DEWAR, IDOC, C. BYNUM and others
Plaintiff:
RAFAEL ROSA, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
