Cases 11 - 20 of 28
DOSS v. UNION ASSOCIATED PHYSICIANS CLINIC, LLC
as 2:2019cv00346
Defendant:
UNION ASSOCIATED PHYSICIANS CLINIC, LLC
Plaintiff:
RACHAEL R. DOSS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
HARRISON v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2019cv02173
Defendant:
PAMELA JOHNSON, RACHAEL HOUGHTON, MURAT POLAR and others
Plaintiff:
HARRY HARRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCHMEES v. HC1.COM, INC.
as 1:2018cv03606
Defendant:
hc1.com, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Rachael Scheemes f/k/a Black and RACHAEL SCHMEES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00238
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
WALTERS v. CORIZON HEALTH et al
as 1:2017cv04108
Defendant:
AQWAY, KIMBERLY BALLARD, CHASSITY and others
Miscellaneou:
PLAINFIELD CF (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
LANCE W. WALTERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BATES et al v. STATE OF OHIO et al
as 1:2017cv01586
Plaintiff:
CLAYTON M BATES, MISTY C. BRICKLES, FAMILY AND KIN OF CLAYTON M. BATES and others
Defendant:
ANNEKA COLLINS, RICHARD M. DEWINE, KEVIN GREER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Foos v. Gladieux et al
as 1:2017cv00188
Plaintiff:
Rachael Foos
Defendant:
David Gladieux and Quality Correctional Care LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00622
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
LOCKLEAR v. HERALD et al
as 4:2016cv00085
Defendant:
ADVANCED CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE, INC., NADIR AL-SHAMI, JEREMY ARNOLD and others
Plaintiff:
ELAINE LOCKLEAR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adams et al v. Explorer Van Company, Inc.
as 1:2014cv00384
Plaintiff:
Paul Adams and Rachael Adams
Defendant:
Explorer Van Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
