Cases 11 - 20 of 44
Fettig et al v. Fox et al
as 1:2019cv00096
Defendant:
Ryan Waters, Bartlett & West, MHA Nations federally chartered Section 17 Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Fettig, Gabriel Fettig and Howard Fettig
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Knowles v. D.O.C.R. et al
as 1:2019cv00098
Defendant:
Shaun Fode, Steve Bement, Dave Roggenbuck and others
Plaintiff:
Efrain Reyes Knowles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Janssen v. Valley City, City of et al
as 3:2019cv00079
Defendant:
Jenna Jochim, Wade Hannig, Barnes County Ambulance, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
LuAnne Janssen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilkinson v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2017cv00147
Plaintiff:
Randy Wilkinson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427
Matthews et al v. Missouri Basin Well Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00046
Plaintiff:
Randy Matthews and Carmela Matthews
Defendant:
Missouri Basin Well Service, Inc. and John Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carroll et al v. Westby et al
as 1:2016cv00020
Plaintiff:
Edward Carroll and Rose Carroll
Defendant:
Ryan Westby , Randy Westby and R.W. Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Bartole v. Rodlund et al
as 3:2016cv00006
Plaintiff:
Marcus Trevor Bartole
Defendant:
Mark Rodlund, Maggie D. Anderson, Melanie Flynn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Estrada v. Flieth
as 3:2015cv00097
Plaintiff:
Felipe Estrada
Defendant:
Randy Flieth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leiss v. North Dakota Lottery.Gov et al
as 1:2015cv00121
Plaintiff:
Curtis B. Leiss
Defendant:
North Dakota Lottery.Gov and Randy Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stedman et al v. ARMtech Insurance Services, Inc.
as 3:2015cv00060
Plaintiff:
Randy Stedman , Lanell Stedman and Arlo Stedman
Defendant:
ARMtech Insurance Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
