Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 53
CLARK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv88389
Defendant: AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff: RAYMOND CLARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CLARK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv76212
Defendant: AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff: RAYMOND CLARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nash et al v. Countywide Carting, LTD et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2019cv09138
Plaintiff: Darryl Payne, Mr. John Forte, Mr. Lawrence Nash and others
Defendant: Countywide Carting, LTD and Morris Jacobowitz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
In re: Clarke We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-1698
Appellee: ANDREI IANCU, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
Appellant: In re: RAYMOND CLARKE and LANDEC CORPORATION
Clark v. Wyman-Gordon Forgings, Inc.
as 4:2018cv04831
Defendant: Wyman-Gordon Forgings, Inc.
Plaintiff: Raymond Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Raymond Clark v. Tehachapi State Prison We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv09241
Petitioner: Raymond Clark
Respondent: Tehachapi State Prison
Van Horn et al v. The City of Port Arthur, Texas et al
as 1:2017cv00344
Plaintiff: Elie Van Horn and Oanh Tran Van Horn
Defendant: The City of Port Arthur, Texas , The Port Arthur Police Department , Bryan McDougal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Raymond Clark v. Warden
as 17-16307
Petitioner - Appellant: RAYMOND CLARK
Respondent - Appellee: WARDEN
Clark v. Warden Tehachapi State Prison We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00571
Petitioner: Raymond Clark
Respondent: Warden Tehachapi State Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Raymond Clark v. Warden We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv03002

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?