Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Bonavita v. Red Restaurant Operations, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv24440
Plaintiff:
Joseph Bonavita
Defendant:
Red Restaurant Operations, Inc., Peter Vauthy and Brad Friedlander
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jackson v. Tent Restaurant Operations, Inc.
as 4:2013cv00073
Plaintiff:
Michelle A. Jackson
Defendant:
Tent Restaurant Operations, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Brown v. Consolidated Restaurant Operations, Inc.
as 3:2012cv00788
Plaintiff:
Kathy Brown
Defendant:
Consolidated Restaurant Operations, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CHANCY v. TENT RESTAURANT OPERATION INC.
as 2:2012cv04277
Plaintiff:
SONJA CHANCY
Defendant:
TENT RESTAURANT OPERATION INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brown v. Cash Technologies of America, Corp. et al
as 3:2011cv00146
Plaintiff:
Yvonna Brown
Defendant:
Cash Technologies of America, Corp. and Tent Restaurant Operations, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693
Fox v. TENT Restaurant Operations, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv02814
Plaintiff:
Joseph Fox
Defendant:
TENT Restaurant Operations, Inc. , John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01385
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Word v. TENT Restaurant Operations, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00404
Plaintiff:
Kristi Word
Defendant:
TENT Restaurant Operations, Inc. and John Does 1 and 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Whitefield v. McDonald's Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv10076
Defendant:
McDonald's Corporation, McDonald's Restaurants of Florida, Inc., McDonald's Restaurants of Delaware, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Mary Ann Whitefield
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
