Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Dodd v. Warden
as 3:2019cv00312
Petitioner:
Richard Dodd
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dodd v. Wexford Medical Inc et al
as 3:2019cv00299
Defendant:
Wexford Medical Inc, Jane Doe #1, Jane Doe #2 and others
Not Yet Classified:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
Richard Dodd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DODD v. O'SULLIVAN et al
as 1:2019cv00647
Defendant:
FAMILY COURT, STATE OF NEW YORK, TODD DEXTER and others
Plaintiff:
ERROL RICHARD DODD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reverse Mortgage Solutions, Inc. v. Cumberland et al
as 8:2019cv00067
Defendant:
Patsy D. Cumberland and Richard Dodd
Plaintiff:
Reverse Mortgage Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reverse Mortgage Solutions, Inc. v. Cumberland et al
as 8:2019cv00067
Defendant:
Patsy D. Cumberland and Richard Dodd
Plaintiff:
Reverse Mortgage Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Acevedo et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11426
Plaintiff:
David Hutchinson, Jeffrey Bednar, Paul McCahey and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Dodd v. Wexford Medical et al
as 3:2018cv00880
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Wexford Medical and Dr Jackson
Plaintiff:
Richard Dodd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DODD v. ZATECKY et al
as 1:2017cv03955
Defendant:
DUANE ALSIP, STEVE KRAUSE, NATHAN LAGENOUR and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD DODD
Miscellaneou:
WESTVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DODD v. CORIZON HEALTH, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv01497
Defendant:
(intentionally left blank), (intentionally left blank), (intentionally left blank) and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD DODD
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Dodd v. USA
as 1:2015cv00413
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
David Richard Dodd, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
