Cases 11 - 20 of 133
Christopher v. Town Administrator et al
as 1:2023cv10823
Plaintiff:
Robert Christopher and Robert Christopher LaRoche
Defendant:
Town Administrator, Chief of Police, On Duty Supervisor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Young et al v. Harrison County, Texas et al
as 2:2023cv00102
Plaintiff:
Robert Christopher Young, Jr. and LaShun Fuqua
Defendant:
Harrison County, Texas and Southern Health Partners, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SCIRE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv05472
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CHRISTOPHER SCIRE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SARAZIN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv01942
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CHRISTOPHER SARAZIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Robert Christopher Kettenburg v. Downtown LA Law
as 2:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
Robert Christopher Kettenburg
Defendant:
Downtown LA Law
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Adams v. Jefferys et al
as 3:2022cv02695
Plaintiff:
Robert Christopher Adams
Defendant:
Rob Jefferys and John/Jane Doe 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANGELLELLA v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14307
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CHRISTOPHER ANGELLELLA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ETTINGER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv13909
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CHRISTOPHER ETTINGER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CALL v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv11354
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CHRISTOPHER CALL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Amos v. American Pacific Mortgage Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv21483
Plaintiff:
Robert Christopher Amos
Defendant:
American Pacific Mortgage Corporation, Joshua Darrimon and Pierce Burton
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
