Cases 11 - 20 of 72
Franks v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv05001
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Nadine S Franks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dimitri Shivkov, et al v. Artex Risk Solutions, Inc., et al
as 19-16746
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OUR RETIREMENT LLC, AFFILION OF HUNTSVILLE PLLC, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, ERIC K. WILKE, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JULIE A. EKDOM, TRIBECA STRATEGIC ACCOUNTANTS LLC, EPSILON ACTUARIAL SOLUTIONS LLC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01061
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Franks v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv03592
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Nadine S Franks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adena S. Frank v. EL AL Israel Airlines Ltd. et al
as 2:2019cv03426
Defendant:
El Al Israel Airlines Ltd. and Does 1 through 100, inclusive
Plaintiff:
Adena S. Frank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Richard Gurule v. Jeri Taylor, et al
as 18-35544
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD EVERETT LEE GURULE
Defendant - Appellee:
JERI TAYLOR, D. WETTLAUFER, D. LOZIER and others
Frank v. No Named Respondents
as 1:2017cv02605
Petitioner:
Travis S. Frank
Respondent:
No Named Respondents
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
v. Frank
as 1:2017cv05046
Defendant:
Dauro S. Frank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Singh v. Gruenwald et al
as 2:2017cv00829
Defendant:
J. Dafoe, C. Dieter, S. Franke and others
Plaintiff:
Rotish Vikash Singh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brower v. Franke et al
as 2:2017cv00367
Defendant:
B. Amsberry, J. Ducheck, S. Franke and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Fredrick Brower
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
