Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01208
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Neal v. State Employees Credit Union
as 2:2019cv00044
Defendant:
State Employees Credit Union
Plaintiff:
Christopher Neal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2019cv00222
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Hussain et al v. State Employees Credit Union et al
as 7:2019cv00217
Defendant:
State Employees Credit Union and Goddard and Peterson PLLC
Plaintiff:
Laketta Hussain and Usama Hussain
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. TILLEY, et al
as 1:2019cv00626
Defendant:
THOMAS BRUCE TILLEY, MARSHA TILLEY, TT FARMS TRUST and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 3001
NEAL v. STATE EMPLOYEES CREDIT UNION et al
as 1:2019cv00302
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER LEE NEAL
Defendant:
LORI MILLER, STATE EMPLOYEES CREDIT UNION, K. D. VADEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LUNSFORD v. GREEN et al
as 1:2018cv00249
Plaintiff:
ROGER KEITH LUNSFORD
Defendant:
GRAHAM GREEN, HALL, MAX WOOTEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00083
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Goodman's Personal Property et al
as 5:2014cv00031
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Goodman's Personal Property, RTP Federal Credit Union Account, State Employees Credit Union Accounts and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981
General Star National Insurance Company v. Howard et al
as 5:2008cv00199
Plaintiff:
General Star National Insurance Company
Defendant:
Michael A Howard, State Employees Credit Union and MH Appraisals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
