Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Martin v. State of MN et al
as 0:2020mc00018
Plaintiff:
Schaaron L Martin
Defendant:
State of MN and City of Mpls.
Occhino v. Geo, Sherman and Assoc. et al
as 0:2019cv02546
Plaintiff:
Richard Leo Occhino
Defendant:
MN State Judge John B. Schultee, Brent Malvick, State of MN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Jackson v. State of MN et al
as 0:2019cv00741
Defendant:
President Donald Trump, Federal And State Agencies and State of MN
Plaintiff:
Howard G. Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2019cv00135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grande v. State of MN et al
as 0:2018cv02904
Defendant:
Dr. William Ericson, Emily Piper Johnson, Dr. Thomas Gratzer and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Ryan Grande
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calhoun v. State of MN DHS Child Support Enforcement et al
as 0:2018cv01881
Defendant:
State of WA DHS Child Support Division, State of MN DHS Child Support Enforcement, Ashley Parker and others
Plaintiff:
Rhome J Calhoun
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calhoun v. State of WA DHS Child Support Division et al
as 3:2018cv01477
Plaintiff:
Rhome J Calhoun
Defendant:
State of WA DHS Child Support Division, Los Angeles County Division of Child Support, State of MN DHS Child Support Enforcement and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ul Mahbub v. Warden, Rush City Prison et al
as 0:2017cv04908
Petitioner:
Maksud Ul Mahbub
Respondent:
Warden, Rush City Prison , John Choi , Lori Swanson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Martin v. Mpls School Dist #1
as 0:2014cv04462
Plaintiff:
Schaaron Martin
Defendant:
Mpls School Dist #1, State of MN, City of Mpls and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hammond v. State of MN et al
as 0:2012cv01660
Plaintiff:
Forrest Hammond
Defendant:
State of MN, County of Anoka, Bruce Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
