Cases 11 - 20 of 52
Benzenhafer v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 2:2018cv00055
Petitioner:
Stephen Earl Benzenhafer
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Scally v. Ferrara
as 2:2017cv01711
Petitioner:
Stephen Earl Scally
Respondent:
Thomas A. Ferrara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sivo v. Benewah County Commissioners et al
as 2:2017cv00329
Petitioner:
Stephen Earl-Linn Sivo
Respondent:
Benewah County Commissioners, Benewah County Sheriff, Benewah County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis v. Director, TDCJ-CID CASE TRANSFERRED TO LUFKIN DIVISION
as 6:2017cv00177
Petitioner:
Stephen Earl Davis
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2017cv00043
Petitioner:
Stephen Earl Davis
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2017cv00174
Petitioner:
Stephen Earl Davis
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stephen Earl v. US
as 16-1734
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN EARL
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES VETERANS AFFAIRS, SLOAN D. GIBSON, Acting Secretary of V.A., JAMES CRANDELL, VA Employee and others
Scally v. Ferrara
as 2:2015cv02589
Petitioner:
Stephen Earl Scally
Respondent:
Thomas A. Ferrara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Scally v. Ferrara et al
as 2:2015cv02528
Plaintiff:
Stephen Earl Scally
Defendant:
Thomas A. Ferrara, M. Chirila, L Marsh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EPIC TECH, LLC v. STHR GROUP, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00252
Plaintiff:
EPIC TECH, LLC
Defendant:
STHR GROUP, LLC , PRYOR DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC. , FALCON AMUSEMENT, LLC and others
Cross_claimant:
THOMAS J. LESERRE, JR. , FALCON AMUSEMENT, LLC , ROLAND SCOTT and others
Cross_defendant:
DDDDB,LLC and RICHARD SCHAPPEL
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
