Cases 11 - 20 of 155
In re: Keyon Freeland
as 18-2097
Petitioner:
In re: KEYON FREELAND
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
:
STEVEN GLUNT
Nominal Respondent:
ROBERT D. MARIANI
MASON v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2017cv03759
Petitioner:
LENWOOD MASON
Respondent:
JOHN WETZEL, CYNTHIA LINK and STEVEN GLUNT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Donna Hill v. James Barnacle, et al
as 17-2448
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONNA M. HILL
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES BARNACLE, STEVEN GLUNT, DAVID CLOSE and others
In re: Donna Hill
as 17-1481
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: DONNA M. HILL
Defendant - Respondent:
JAMES BARNACLE, STEVEN GLUNT, DAVID CLOSE and others
Nominal Respondent:
NORA B. FISCHER
JONES v. BAUGHMAN et al
as 3:2016cv00266
Plaintiff:
CHARLES T. JONES
Defendant:
PEGGY BAUGHMAN, KENNETH CAMERON, DORETTA CHENCHARICK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eric Rambert, et al v. Superintendent Forest SCI, et al
as 16-4228
Plaintiff - Pro Se Appellee:
ERIC X. RAMBERT, ANTHONY JOHNSON, MICHAEL BUNDY and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEMETRIUS BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN E. WETZEL, SECRETARY, SUPERINTENDENT FOREST SCI, D. F. OBERLANDER, DSCS and others
JOHNSTON v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2016cv00268
Plaintiff:
NORMAN JOHNSTON
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, SHIRLEY MOORE-SMEAL, STEVEN GLUNT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eric Rambert, et al v. Superintendent Forest SCI, et al
as 16-3778
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC X. RAMBERT
Plaintiff - Pro Se Appellee:
ANTHONY JOHNSON, MICHAEL BUNDY, JOHN PASSMORE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT FOREST SCI, JOHN E. WETZEL, SECRETARY, D. F. OBERLANDER, DSCS and others
Troy Coulston v. Steven Glunt, et al
as 16-2980
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TROY COULSTON
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVEN GLUNT, MR. WILT, MR. YOUNG and others
Williams v. Correct Care Solutions, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv01259
Plaintiff:
Calvin Williams
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, Inc., Khatri, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
