Cases 11 - 20 of 56
Jackson v. Moore et al
as 3:2022cv00452
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Jackson, II
Defendant:
Unit Manager Moore, Active Superintendent, Betsy Jividen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Aldridge et al
as 3:2022cv00443
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Jackson, II
Defendant:
Superintendent Aldridge, Unit Manager Moore, Sgt. Petticrew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lowe v. Ames et al
as 2:2022cv00434
Plaintiff:
Keith W.R. Lowe
Defendant:
Superintendent Donald Ames and Major Richard Toney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eakle v. Tibbs et al
as 5:2022cv00219
Plaintiff:
David Eakle
Defendant:
Timothy Tibbs, Michael Costello, Shannon Sams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Francisco v. Tibbs et al
as 5:2022cv00218
Plaintiff:
Ryan Francisco
Defendant:
Timothy Tibbs, Michael Costello, Shannon Sams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lamb v. Tibbs et al
as 5:2022cv00217
Plaintiff:
Virgil Lamb
Defendant:
Timothy Tibbs, Michael Costello, Shannon Sams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moore v. Aldridge et al
as 3:2022cv00141
Plaintiff:
Brandon Edward Moore
Defendant:
Superintendent, Sgt. Smith, Ofc. Albright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00562
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Greene v. Feaster et al
as 5:2021cv00140
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Greene
Defendant:
Sidney Feaster, Governor Jim Justice, Randolph County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goysovich v. Straughn et al
as 3:2021cv00081
Defendant:
West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitations, Superintendent Shawn Straughn, John Does(s) and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew J. Goysovich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
