Cases 11 - 20 of 100
SWARTZ v. SPARKMD, INC. et al
as 3:2026cv12272
Defendant:
SPARKMD, INC. doing business as BLUEBERRY PEDIATRICS, BLUEBERRY PEDIATRICS, BLUEBERRY MEDICAL PA and others
Plaintiff:
SHELBIE SWARTZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Williams v. Alessi et al
as 1:2026cv02361
Plaintiff:
Dyquan Williams
Defendant:
G. Alessi, G. Olles, J. Cogovan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02833
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Meghan Kelly v. Patricia Swartz, et al
as 26-3570
Plaintiff:
Meghan M. Kelly
Defendant:
Disciplinary Counsel Patricia B. Swartz, Disciplinary Counsel Kathleen M. Vavala, Chief Disciplinary Counsel David A. White and others
Caleb Whitfield v. Michael Swartz
as 26-3920
Petitioner:
CALEB WHITFIELD
Respondent:
MICHAEL K. SWARTZ, Warden, Toledo Correctional Institution
Caleb Whitfield v. Michael Swartz
as 26-3884
Petitioner:
CALEB WHITFIELD
Respondent:
MICHAEL K. SWARTZ, Warden, Toledo Correctional Institution
Lloyd Swartz, By and Through His Attorney-In-Fact Gary Swartz v. Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC
as 4:2026cv00840
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Swartz, By and Through His Attorney-In-Fact Gary Swartz
Defendant:
Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
In re: Norman Pryor
as 26-3878
Petitioner:
In re: NORMAN LAFONTE PRYOR, aka Nc LaFonse Pryor
Respondent:
MICHAEL K. SWARTZ, Warden
United States of America v. Swartz
as 26-6228
Defendant:
JESSE FRANKLIN SWARTZ and Franklin Wright
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Norman PryorIn re: Norman Pryor
as 26-3864
Petitioner:
In re: NORMAN LAFONTE PRYOR, aka Nc LaFonse Pryor
Respondent:
MICHAEL K. SWARTZ, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
