Cases 11 - 20 of 100
Swartz v. Kim, et al.
as 26-3726
Petitioner:
JESSE FRANKLIN SWARTZ and Franklin Wright
Respondent:
SALLIE KIM, MAGISTRATE JUDGE, WILLIAM ALSUP, DISTRICT JUDGE and UNKNOWN PARTY, Commanding Officer, Elmwood Correctional
Randall Hutchison v. Joseph Biden, et al
as 26-3465
Plaintiff:
RANDALL TYLER HUTCHISON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNIT MANAGER HERNANDEZ and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026at00823
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01839
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Swartz v. USA
as 3:2026cv04709
Petitioner:
Jesse Franklin Swartz
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lawrence Carty, et al v. Governor of the Virgin Islands, et al
as 26-2063
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE CARTY, JEFF IMMEL, MAO PENHA and others
Defendant:
GOVERNOR OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS, DIRECTOR VIRGIN ISLANDS BUREAU OF CORRECTIONS, WARDEN CRIMINAL JUSTICE COPMPLEX and others
Silver v. Swartz
as 1:2026cv00968
Petitioner:
Terrell Silver
Respondent:
Warden Michael Swartz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Spencer v. Swartz et al.
as 3:2026cv00961
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Spencer
Defendant:
Warden M. Swartz, D. Burkhart, J. Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02170
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act - Enforcement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
