Cases 11 - 20 of 2,889
STRIPLIN v. WRAY et al
as 1:2024cv01437
Plaintiff:
AAREN WILLIAMS STRIPLIN
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY, KAMALA D. HARRIS, LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III and others
Santana Isaac v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2024cv04015
Petitioner:
Jeisy Santana Isaac
Defendant:
Aledandro Mayorkas, Director UR M JADDOU and Director Kevin J. Riddle
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
SANTANA v. JOHNSON AND JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv06198
Plaintiff:
IDELSY SANTANA
Defendant:
JOHNSON AND JOHNSON, JOHNSON AND JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., JOHNSON AND JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03935
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MacDonald et al v. Johnson et al
as 3:2024cv00372
Plaintiff:
Kinley MacDonald, AJ, BM and others
Defendant:
Daniel Johnson, Bruce Kile, Bar Counsel Members and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Santana-Cerano v. Rule et al
as 4:2024cv00403
Plaintiff:
Maribel Santana-Cerano
Defendant:
Warden FNU Rule, Warden FNU Cates, FNU Nodiand and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Macdonald v. Andrus et al
as 1:2024cv11199
Plaintiff:
Kinley Macdonald
Defendant:
Justin Andrus, Circuit Judge David J. Barron, Clerk, USCA Chanda J Beita and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MACDONALD v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
KINLEY MACDONALD
Defendant:
DANIEL JOHNSON, BRUCE KILE, BOARD OF OVERSEERS OF THE BAR and others
Not Yet Classified:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Santana v. Garland
as 24-2756
Petitioner:
J. JESUS SUAREZ SANTANA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
