Cases 11 - 20 of 563
Davis v. Sapphire Cartage, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Erica N Davis
Defendant:
Sapphire Cartage, LLC and Franklin Scott Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Feinberg v. Smith, et al
as 1:2023cv02165
Plaintiff:
Hadassah Feinberg
Defendant:
Marcie Smith, Marisa McClellan, Currin Haines-Yoder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Doe et al
as 6:2023cv06719
Plaintiff:
Ryan Scott Smith
Defendant:
John Doe and Niagara Falls Polices
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WASHINGTON v. SOUTH WOODS STATE PRISON et al
as 1:2023cv23179
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SCOTT SMITH WASHINGTON, JR.
Defendant:
SOUTH WOODS STATE PRISON, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ANTHONY DEGNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Christensen
as 1:2023cv02052
Petitioner:
Stephen Scott Smith
Respondent:
Warden D. Christensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Harris v. Taurasi et al
as 1:2023cv01974
Plaintiff:
Cornelius E. Harris
Defendant:
Lee Ann Taurasi, Robert Martin, Eric Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
David Meyers v. Dean Locklear
as 23-7167
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
DEAN LOCKLEAR, WILLIAM BULLARD, LIEUTENANT BARNES and others
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv24712
Plaintiff:
SCOTT SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv20981
Plaintiff:
SCOTT SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-30704
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
