Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv07960
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Pramco III LLC v. Wood et al
as 2:2011cv00935
Plaintiff: Pramco III LLC
Defendant: Barbara A Wood, J Thomas Wood, HWA Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moshogiannis v. Security Consultants Group, Inc We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2010cv05971
Plaintiff: Konstrantinos Moshogiannis
Defendant: Security Consultants Group, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00863
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-14730
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00345
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Reginald Jerome Tisdale v. City of Los Angeles et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv08523
Defendant: All Action Security Consulting Group, Inc., City of Los Angeles, County of Los Angeles and others
Plaintiff: Reginald Jerome Tisdale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00594
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
AKAL SECURITY, INC. v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00326
Plaintiff: AKAL SECURITY, INC.
Defendant: USA
Intervenor_defendant: SECURITY CONSULTANTS GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00248
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?