Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 31
MARMONTELLO et al v. AMERICAN BILTRITE, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv00462
Defendant: GARDNER DENVER, INC., METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, MAGID GLOVE AND SAFETY MANUFACTURING COMPANY, LLC and others
Plaintiff: JOAN MARMONTELLO and CHARLES MARMONTELLO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Flowers et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2018cv00477
Plaintiff: Janis Flowers , James Flowers and Gerald Flowers, Jr.
Defendant: 3M Company, Armstrong Pumps, Inc., Aurora Pump Company and others
Cross_claimant: Aurora Pump Company , Honeywell International, Inc. , Dap Products Inc. and others
Cross_defendant: Aurora Pump Company , 3M Company, Armstrong Pumps, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Connor-Lopez et al v. Aerco International, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv03596
Plaintiff: Lynda Connor-Lopez, Gail Rochester, Angelina Marie Chapman and others
Defendant: Aerco, International, Inc. , Alfa Laval Inc. , Ameron International Corporation and others
Cross_claimant: John Crane, Inc. , Industrial Holdings Corporation , The Nash Engineering Company and others
Cross_defendant: John Crane, Inc. , 3M Company, Aerco, International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hardy v. Crane Co. et al
as 1:2017cv10826
Defendant: Crane Co., Carrier Corporation, CBS Corporation and others
Cross Claimant: FMC Corporation and Bayer Cropscience, Inc.
Cross Defendant: Riley Power Inc., A. W. Chesterton Co., Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Charles Hardy
Not Classified By Court: Judge Robert B. Collings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Fittery et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation as successor by merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv13385
Defendant: Flowserve US, Inc.,, Foster Wheeler, LLC, Crosby Valve and Gage Company and others
Plaintiff: Larry R. Fittery and Nancy J. Fittery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Walashek, et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv01567
Plaintiff: Gail Elizabeth Walashek , Michelle Walashek , Keith Walashek and others
Defendant: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Alfa Laval, Inc. , Amtrol, Inc. and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff: Crane Co.
Thirdparty_defendant: The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Zurich American Insurance Co., et al v. Watts Regulator Co., et al
as 13-1832
Plaintiff - Appellee: ZURICH-AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, as successor-in-interest to Zurich Insurance Company and AMERICAN GUARANTEE & LIABILITY INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant - Appellant: WATTS REGULATOR CO. and WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., f/k/a Watts Industries, Inc.
Defendant: SPENCE ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC. and CIRCOR INTERNATIONAL, INC.
MacQueen v. Union Carbide Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00831
Plaintiff: Marguerite MacQueen
Defendant: Union Carbide Corporation, Acme Engineering & Manufacturing , Aerco International Inc. and others
Cross_claimant: General Electric Company, IMO Industries Inc. and Hyde Windlass Company
Cross_defendant: General Electric Company , 3M Company, Acme Engineering & Manufacturing and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
MacQueen v. Union Carbide Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv00835
Plaintiff: Marguerite MacQueen
Defendant: Union Carbide Corporation, Acme Engineering & Manufacturing , Aerco International Inc. and others
Cross_claimant: IMO Industries Inc. and Hyde Windless Company
Cross_defendant: IMO Industries Inc. , 3M Company, Acme Engineering & Manufacturing and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
ANDREWS, SR. v. A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS et al
as 2:2012cv60144
Plaintiff: JOHN E. ANDREWS, SR.
Defendant: A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP. , AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?