Cases 11 - 20 of 881
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
LAMEX AGRIFOODS, INC. v. FROZEN FOOD DEVELOPMENT, INC. et al
as 5:2024cv00880
Plaintiff:
LAMEX AGRIFOODS, INC.
Defendant:
FROZEN FOOD DEVELOPMENT, INC., GARY GREGORY and M & T BANK
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
Hall v. Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co.
as 8:2024cv00401
Plaintiff:
LETRIA HALL
Defendant:
MANUFACTURERS & TRADERS TRUST CO. doing business as M&T BANK CORP.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2605 RESPA: Servicing of Mortgage Loans
MAH Advising PLLC v. M&T Bank Corporation et al
as 8:2024cv00363
Plaintiff:
MAH Advising PLLC
Defendant:
M&T Bank Corporation doing business as Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company/M&T Bank, Jill Zanghi and Laurie Risell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Deane v. M&T Bank
as 2:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Ryan Omowale Deane
Defendant:
M&T Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
McCloud v. M&T Bank Corporation
as 1:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Delores McCloud
Defendant:
M&T Bank Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
McKenzie v. M&T Bank
as 2:2023cv00758
Plaintiff:
George McKenzie
Defendant:
M&T Bank
Other:
ENE Evaluator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Contract Default
Parker v. Clearpath Lending et al
as 3:2023cv01437
Plaintiff:
Natosha L. Parker
Defendant:
Clearpath Lending, US Bank, NA, M&T Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
