Cases 11 - 20 of 605
Massachusetts Lobsterman's Association, Inc. v. National Marine Fisheries Service, et al
as 24-1220
Plaintiff:
MASSACHUSETTS LOBSTERMAN'S ASSOCIATION, INC.
Defendant:
NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, GINA M. RAIMONDO, Secretary, in her official capacity and JANET COIT, Assistant Administrator, in her official capacity
Appellant:
RICHARD MAXIMUS STRAHAN
Interested Party:
CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION, INC., CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE and others
Environmental Protection Information Center, et al. v. van Atta, et al.
as 24-1813
Plaintiff:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION INFORMATION CENTER and FRIENDS OF THE SHASTA RIVER
Defendant:
ALICIA VAN ATTA, in her official capacity, Assistant Regional Administrator, California Coastal Office, National Marine Fisheries Service, JIM SIMONDET, in his official capacity, Contact, California Coastal Office, National Marine Fisheries Service and NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, California Coastal Office
STAVOLA v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE et al
as 3:2024cv00397
Plaintiff:
THOMAS STAVOLA, JR
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, GINA RAIMONDO and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Massachusetts Lobstermen's Association, Inc. v. National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) et al
as 1:2024cv10332
Plaintiff:
Massachusetts Lobstermen's Association, Inc.
Defendant:
National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), Gina Raimondo and Janet Coit
Amicus Curiae:
Pro Se Party Richard Strahan, Conservation Law Foundation, Center for Biological Diversity and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
GREEN OCEANS et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR et al
as 1:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
GREEN OCEANS, RESPONSIBLE OFFSHORE DEVELOPMENT ALLIANCE, SAVE RIGHT WHALES COALITION and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, DEB HAALAND, BUREAU OF OCEAN ENERGY MANAGEMENT and others
Petitioner:
SOUTH FORK WIND, LLC and REVOLUTION WIND, LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
NORTH CAROLINA FISHERIES ASSOCIATION, INC. et al v. RAIMONDO et al
as 1:2023cv03905
Plaintiff:
NORTH CAROLINA FISHERIES ASSOCIATION, INC., SOUTHEASTERN FISHERIES ASSOCIATION, INC., SFA EAST COAST FISHERIES SECTION and others
Defendant:
GINA RAIMONDO, NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION and NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1801 Fishery Conservation and Management Act (FCMA)
Center For Biological Diversity et al v. Raimondo et al
as 3:2023cv06642
Plaintiff:
Center For Biological Diversity and Turtle Island Restoration Network
Defendant:
Gina Raimondo and National Marine Fisheries Service
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Southern Cross Seafoods, LLC v. United States et al
as 0:2024cv60040
Plaintiff:
Southern Cross Seafoods, LLC
Defendant:
United States and National Marine Fisheries Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Jurisich Oysters, LLC et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 2:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
Jurisich Oysters, LLC, Ameripure Processing Company, Inc., Matthew Tesvich and others
Defendant:
United States Army Corps of Engineers, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, National Marine Fisheries Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Skagit County Dike Drainage and Irrigation Improvement District No 12 v. National Marine Fisheries Service et al
as 2:2023cv01954
Plaintiff:
Skagit County Dike, Drainage, and Irrigation Improvement District No. 12 and Skagit County Dike Drainage and Irrigation Improvement District No 12
Defendant:
National Marine Fisheries Service, Department of Commerce, Gina Raimondo and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
