Cases 11 - 20 of 21
ARNOLD v. COMBS et al
as 1:2015cv00499
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS DENORRIS ARNOLD
Defendant:
COMBS, THOMAS D. SCHROEDER, RUSSELL A. ELIASON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arnold v. Eliason et al
as 1:2015cv01725
Plaintiff:
Travis Denorris Arnold
Defendant:
Russell A Eliason, Thomas D Schroeder, Combs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arnold v. Combs et al
as 1:2015cv01726
Plaintiff:
Travis Denorris Arnold
Defendant:
Combs, Thomas D Schroeder, Russell A Eliason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VAN DYKE v. WEBSTER et al
as 1:2015cv00201
Plaintiff:
DENNIS VAN DYKE
Defendant:
JOE WEBSTER, THOMAS D. SCHROEDER, PATRICIA S. CONNOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MACIAS v. SHARP et al
as 1:2014cv00842
Plaintiff:
EDWARD THOMAS MACIAS
Defendant:
SHARP, THOMAS D. SCHROEDER and GREENSBORO FEDERAL COURT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Sidney Harr v. State of North Carolina
as 14-1887
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SIDNEY B. HARR
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER, RICHARD H. BRODHEAD, Ph. D. and others
Defendant:
MAGISTRATE PAUL TREVOR SHARP
HARR v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2013cv00673
Plaintiff:
SIDNEY B. HARR
Defendant:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA , THOMAS D. SCHROEDER, RICHARD H. BRODHEAD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Christopher Headen v. USA, et al
as 13-5131
Petitioner - Appellant:
Christopher Mark Headen
Respondent - Appellee:
United States of America and Thomas D. Schroeder
HEADEN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2013cv00547
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER MARK HEADEN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and THOMAS D. SCHROEDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JACKSON v. BRUBAKER et al
as 1:2009cv00804
Plaintiff:
WILLIE A. JACKSON
Defendant:
JOHN BRUBAKER, WALLACE W. DIXON and THOMAS D. SCHROEDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
