Cases 11 - 20 of 22
THOMPSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv04617
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TYLER THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THOMPSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv68720
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TYLER THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv93083
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TYLER THOMPSON SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THOMPSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv80859
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TYLER THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown v. Dennison et al
as 3:2020cv00002
Defendant:
Chad Hillard, Warden Walker, C. Kwiatkowski and others
Plaintiff:
Ernest Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willis et al v. USA et al
as 3:2018cv01520
Plaintiff:
Carlie Willis and Tyler Thompson
Defendant:
Southern Illinois Hospital Services, United States of America and USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sonya Huerta et al v. The City of Santa Barbara et al
as 2:2017cv06225
Defendant:
John Barriga, Nathan Beltran, P. Cobb and others
Plaintiff:
Sonya Huerta and Yvonne Huerta
Peffer et al v. Thompson et al
as 1:2017cv00578
Plaintiff:
Julie Peffer and Jesse Peffer
Defendant:
Tyler Thompson, Dan King and Rich Kopach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maughs v. Shasta County Sheriff, et al.
as 2:2017cv01294
Plaintiff:
Christopher Robin Maughs
Defendant:
Shasta County Sheriff , Tom Bosenko , Tom Moon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Fressadi et al v. Powell et al
as 4:2012cv00876
Plaintiff:
Arek Fressadi and Unknown Parties
Defendant:
Jay Powell, BMO Financial Group, Unknown Parties and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
