Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Tyrone Shelton v. Ather Iqbal
as 21-6357
Defendant / Appellee:
S. CLEMENT, Medical Administrator, JEFFREY N. DILLMAN, Health Services Director, TIM DOMINICK, Physician's Assistant and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYRONE SHELTON
Shelton v. Iqbal et al
as 1:2021cv00032
Defendant:
Jeffrey N. Dillman, Tim Dominick, Ather Iqbal and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Shelton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shelton v. Iqbal et al
as 7:2021cv00006
Defendant:
Jeffrey N. Dillman, Tim Dominick, Ather Iqbal and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Shelton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shelton v. Wang et al
as 7:2020cv00704
Defendant:
Melvin Davis, T. Cobbs, Jeffrey N. Dillman and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Shelton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shelton v. Clarke
as 7:2020cv00640
Petitioner:
Tyrone Shelton
Respondent:
Harold Clark and Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Shelton v. Walrath et al
as 1:2019cv01596
Defendant:
S. W. Allen, Darrell L. Miller, L. Wang and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Shelton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Achashverosh Ammiyhuwd v. Michael Pompeo, et al
as 19-1159
Respondent / Appellee:
MICHAEL R. POMPEO, U.S. Secretary of State, KIRSTJEN M. NIELSEN, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, TYRONE SHELTON, Regional Director of the New Hampshire Passport Agency and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
ACHASHVEROSH ADNAH AMMIYHUWD
Ammiyhuwd v. Pompeo et al
as 2:2019cv00003
Petitioner:
Achashverosh Adnah Ammiyhuwh
Respondent:
Tyrone Shelton, Robert N Trgovich, Michael Richard Pompeo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Shelton v. M.S. Transportation, Inc et al
as 4:2012cv00057
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Shelton
Defendant:
M.S. Transportation, Inc and Mamadou K. SY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shelton v. Matthews et al
as 7:2011cv00132
Defendant:
Gary L. Bass, Major Roland Beauford, Wendy Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Shelton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
