Cases 11 - 20 of 324
Lietzke v. City of Montgomery et al
as 0:2023cv03336
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
City of Montgomery, Kevin Murphy and Steven Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lietzke v. City of Montgomery et al
as 0:2023cv03329
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
City of Montgomery, Chief Kevin Murphy, Steven Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lietzke v. City of Montgomery et al
as 0:2023cv03332
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
City of Montgomery, Kevin Murphy and Steven Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lietzke v. City of Montgomery et al
as 0:2023cv03328
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
City of Montgomery, Kevin Murphy and Steven Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lietzke v. City of Montgomery et al
as 0:2023cv03244
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
City of Montgomery, Montgomery Police Department, Steven Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00567
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12111 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00464
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Dobbin Plantersville Water Supply Corporation v. City of Montgomery, Texas
as 4:2023cv02358
Plaintiff:
Dobbin Plantersville Water Supply Corporation
Defendant:
City of Montgomery, Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00346
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12201 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00345
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
