Cases 11 - 20 of 343
Riley v. OMH Commissioner of New York State Office of Mental Health
as 1:2024cv01408
Petitioner:
Christopher Riley
Respondent:
OMH Commissioner of New York State Office of Mental Health
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Campbell v. Office of Mental Health et al
as 1:2024cv00784
Plaintiff:
Kamron Campbell
Defendant:
Office of Mental Health, Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Avila v. ACACIA Network, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00884
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Avila
Defendant:
ACACIA Network, Inc., Trevor Griffiths, Aja Douglas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Inoa v. Dziduch
as 24-269
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSE INOA
Defendant / Appellee:
L.T. DZIDUCH, L.T. ENSER, L.T. DELANEY and others
Defendant:
ATTICA C.F., Medical Personel John Doe(s); Jane Doe(s) and ATTICA C.F., Office of Mental Health, John Doe(s); Jane Doe(s)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv11098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv06024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Engles v. Annucci et al
as 9:2023cv01259
Plaintiff:
Jessie Engles and Jesse Engles
Defendant:
Anthony Annucci, Brian Fisher, Diane Van Buren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv08911
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv07963
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Smith v. Rogers et al
as 1:2023cv01407
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Smith
Defendant:
MD Carla Rogers, MHM Centurion, Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
