Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Overla v. Sheriff of Tippecanoe County, Indiana
as 4:2014cv00026
Plaintiff:
Anthony Overla
Defendant:
Sheriff of Tippecanoe County, Indiana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matson v. Tippecanoe County Indiana et al
as 4:2014cv00014
Defendant:
Tippecanoe County Indiana , Tippecanoe Sheriff's Department , Tracy Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Brenda Matson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PLANNED PARENTHOOD v. COMMISSIONER, et al.
as 1:2013cv01335
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER, INDIANA STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH and PROSECUTOR, TIPPECANOE COUNTY, INDIANA
Plaintiff:
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF INDIANA AND KENTUCKY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martinez v Regnerus et al
as 4:2013cv00012
Defendant:
Officer Regnerus, Officer Withers, Lafayette Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Nicolas Bernardo Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Tippecanoe County Indiana et al
as 4:2012cv00027
Plaintiff:
Joseph D Lewis
Defendant:
Tippecanoe County Indiana and Tippecanoe County Commissioners
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. 4542 Chisholm Trail Lafayette Tippecanoe County Indiana et al
as 4:2011cv00007
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
4542 Chisholm Trail Lafayette Tippecanoe County Indiana, Jeremy Hampton, Lafayette City of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. McKinsey et al
as 4:2010cv00083
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Sophia M McKinsey, Raydonna A McKinsey, Sophia Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. South Country Road 950 East Tippecanoe County Indiana et al
as 2:2008cv00012
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
South Country Road 950 East Tippecanoe County Indiana, $2,650.00 in US Currency and $7,868.55
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
