Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Rufus Spearman v. Daniel Heyns, et al
as 17-1338
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUFUS SPEARMAN, aka Rufus Lamar Savin Spearman
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL H. HEYNS, Director of the MDOC, RICHARD D. RUSSELL, Grievance Manager & Misconduct Hearings Administrator, UNKNOWN PART(Y)(IES), named as Kinross Complex Store, Jane Doe (Prisoner Store Employees) and others
William Foster v. George Lombardi, et al
as 16-4112
Plaintiff - Appellant:
William Wentworth Foster
Defendant - Appellee:
George Lombardi, Director, Ian Wallace, Warden, Paula Reed, Assistant Warden and others
Foster v. Lombardi et al
as 1:2016cv00241
Plaintiff:
William Wentworth Foster
Defendant:
George Lombardi, Ian Wallace, Paula Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spearman #320836 v. Heyns et al
as 2:2015cv00015
Plaintiff:
Rufus L. Spearman #320836
Defendant:
Daniel H. Heyns, Richard D. Russell, Unknown Part(y)(ies) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Threatt #182625 v. Rose et al
as 2:2012cv00274
Plaintiff:
Anthony Threatt #182625
Defendant:
Senta Rose, Unknown Westcomb, Unknown Carr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor #361170 v. Tennyson et al
as 2:2012cv00229
Plaintiff:
Marcus Taylor #361170
Defendant:
D. Tennyson, Unknown Miron, Unknown Hubble and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark #222915 v. Lindemuth, et al
as 2:2011cv00336
Plaintiff:
Aaron Clark #222915
Defendant:
T. Lindemuth, Unknown Briggs, Catherine S. Bauman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams #173279 v. Jones et al
as 1:2007cv01011
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Williams #173279
Defendant:
Unknown Jones, Willie O. Smith, Herold Gilkey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Passley v. Poplar Bluff Police Department et al
as 1:2007cv00003
Plaintiff:
Martin A. Passley
Defendant:
Poplar Bluff Police Department, Jeff Rowland, Butch Mobily and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
