Cases 11 - 20 of 36
Leroy Kelly v. Harold Clarke
as 20-6473
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the VA Department of Corrections
Petitioner / Appellant:
LEROY JOSEPH KELLY
Mutafis v. North Central Regional Jail et al
as 1:2020cv00015
Defendant:
St. Marys Correction Center Medical, Timothy Bowen, Sgt. Parsons and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Theodore Mutafis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miley v. VA Department of Corrections
as 2:2018cv00538
Respondent:
VA Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Kassiem Gerome Miley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Harry Brantley v. Gene Johnson
as 18-6542
Petitioner - Appellant:
HARRY BRANTLEY
Respondent - Appellee:
GENE JOHNSON, Director for the VA Department of Corrections
Harry Brantley v. Harold Clarke
as 16-7476
Petitioner - Appellant:
HARRY BRANTLEY
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE
Respondent:
GENE JOHNSON, Director for VA Department of Corrections
Gerald Whiting v. Harold W. Clark
as 16-6003
Petitioner - Appellant:
GERALD WHITING
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARK, Director of VA Department of Corrections
Barriera v. VA Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2015cv00380
Plaintiff:
Alberto Vincent Barriera
Defendant:
VA Department of Corrections, St. Bride's Correctional Facility, Little and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barriera v. VA Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2015cv06342
Plaintiff:
Alberto Vincent Barriera
Defendant:
VA Department of Corrections, St. Bride's Correctional Facility, Little and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Director of the VA Department of Corrections
as 3:2015cv00265
Petitioner:
Tehgrain Jamal Jones
Respondent:
Director of the VA Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
John Smith v. Harold Clarke
as 15-6375
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN KEITH SMITH
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, VA Department of Corrections
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
