Cases 11 - 20 of 208
Williams #124345 v. Yuma, County of
as 2:2022cv01120
Plaintiff:
DaJuan Torrell Williams
Defendant:
Yuma, County of, Leon N Wilmot, Robert Arriola and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harmon v. Rock et al
as 1:2022cv00847
Plaintiff:
James E. Harmon
Defendant:
Todd A. Rock, Donna B. Reese, Tinna M. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Walker et al
as 1:2022cv00041
Plaintiff:
Aaron Christopher Davis
Defendant:
W Walker, Sewel and T. Bryars
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams #124345 v. Yuma, County of et al
as 2:2022cv00154
Plaintiff:
DaJuan Torrell Williams
Defendant:
Yuma, County of, Bianca Acosta, Julian Aguayo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALKER JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv48991
Plaintiff:
WINSEL W WALKER JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WALKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv44941
Plaintiff:
BRUCE W WALKER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOPKINS v. PREMIER FINANCIAL BANCORP, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv02735
Defendant:
THOMAS W WRIGHT, DOUGLAS V REYNOLDS, TONEY K ADKINS and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW HOPKINS
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Walker v. Premier Financial Bancorp, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv05320
Defendant:
Philip E. Cline, Harry M. Hatfield, Neal W. Scaggs and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Walker
Parshall v. Premier Financial Bancorp, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv05304
Defendant:
Philip E. Cline, Harry M. Hatfield, Neal W. Scaggs and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Parshall
Ciccotelli v. Premier Financial Bancorp, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv04859
Defendant:
Keith F. Molihan, Philip E. Cline, Harry M. Hatfield and others
Plaintiff:
Alex Ciccotelli
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
