Cases 11 - 20 of 22
FAIR v. HOWARD et al
as 5:2021cv00330
Plaintiff:
TONY ANTHONY FAIR, JR
Defendant:
INVESTIGATOR RANDY HOWARD, INVESTIGATOR TENNELL, WARDEN AIMEE SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARRION v. SMITH et al
as 5:2021cv00230
Plaintiff:
GREGORY D BARRION
Defendant:
HEAD WARDEN SMITH, DEPUTY WARDEN CHANEY, DEPUTY WARDEN KING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sturgeon v. Warden - Graham Correctional Center
as 3:2020cv00491
Respondent:
Warden - Graham Correctional Center
Petitioner:
David M. Sturgeon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BARRION v. SMITH et al
as 5:2020cv00126
Defendant:
DOCTOR WOODARD, STEVENSON, DEPUTY WARDEN JONES and others
Plaintiff:
GREGORY D BARRION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Townsend v. Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services et al
as 8:2019cv02803
Defendant:
C.O. A. Connell, C.O. Carr, C.O. D. Frenzel and others
Plaintiff:
Devon Jamal Townsend
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Bishop v. United States of America
as 4:2019cv00364
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Kristie M Bishop
Respondent:
Warden Graham Camille Griffin Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Richard Lavonte Blanks, Sr. v. Warden Graham
as 16-7693
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICHARD LAVONTE BLANKS, SR.
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN GRAHAM and BRIAN E. FROSH, The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Mason v. South Carolina
as 5:2015cv04963
Petitioner:
Julie Melton Mason
Respondent:
Warden, Graham Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sherinette Wannamaker v. Warden
as 14-7844
Petitioner - Appellant:
SHERINETTE WANNAMAKER, a/k/a Sheri Wannamaker
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN, Graham Correctional Institution, Camille Griffin
Respondent:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
James Harris v. Cecil Polley
as 14-3475
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES C. HARRIS
Respondent - Appellee:
CECIL POLLEY, Acting Warden, Graham Correctional Center
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
