Cases 11 - 20 of 53
Miles v. Anthony et al
as 1:2022cv03805
Plaintiff:
Rodney Jerome Miles
Defendant:
C/O Anthony, DW Mims, DW Chambers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waller v. Adam et al
as 6:2022cv00042
Plaintiff:
Thurston Waller
Defendant:
Warden Adam and Juanita Sharpe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. HARPER et al
as 2:2022cv00507
Petitioner:
EBEN BROWN
Respondent:
WARDEN ORLANDO HARPER, DEPUTY WARDEN ADAM SMITH, COUNTY EXECUTIVE RICH FITZGERALD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
AVERYTT v. HARPER et al
as 2:2022cv00443
Petitioner:
JAVONIE AVERYTT
Respondent:
WARDEN ORLANDO HARPER, DEPUTY WARDEN ADAM SMITH, RICH FITZGERALD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
David Albers v. Warden Adams
as 22-6279
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID SCOTT ALBERS
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN ADAMS
WILLIAMS v. HARPER et al
as 2:2022cv00324
Plaintiff:
RALPH OMAR WILLIAMS
Defendant:
WARDEN ORLANDO HARPER, DEPUTY WARDEN ADAM SMITH and COUNTY EXECUTIVE RICH FITZGERALD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MOSS v. HARPER et al
as 2:2022cv00290
Petitioner:
DONTE ANTIONNE MOSS
Respondent:
WARDEN ORLANDO HARPER, DEPUTY WARDEN ADAM SMITH, COUNTY EXECUTIVE RICH FITZGERALD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BICKHAM v. HARPER et al
as 2:2022cv00254
Plaintiff:
ISAIAH ANTHRIN BICKHAM and ISAIAH BICKHAM
Defendant:
WARDEN ORLANDO L. HARPER, DEPUTY WARDEN ADAM SMITH and MAJOR EDWARDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Perdomo v. Adams
as 5:2021cv00179
Petitioner:
Jose Perdomo
Respondent:
Warden Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Tonia Lewis v. Warden Adams
as 21-7403
Petitioner / Appellant:
TONIA LATRICE LEWIS
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN ADAMS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
