Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01884
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
DUNCOMBE v. ANCHOR INDUSTRIES INC.
as 3:2016cv00188
Defendant:
ANCHOR INDUSTRIES INC.
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE N. DUNCOMBE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 FMLA:Family and Medical Leave Act
Robinson v. Baker et al
as 7:2016cv02797
Plaintiff:
Marcia Robinson
Defendant:
Trevor Baker, Orra Wood, Jane Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Rand-Heart of New York, Inc., et al v. James P. Dolan, et al
as 15-1838
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Rand-Heart of New York, Inc., Michael Rodolico, Ian Henderson and others
Defendant - Appellee:
James P. Dolan and Vicki J. Duncomb
Floridia et al v. Dolan et al
as 0:2014cv03011
Plaintiff:
Antonino Floridia and Matthew Dudevoir
Defendant:
James P. Dolan and Vicki J. Duncomb
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
DUNCOMBE v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC
as 2:2014cv00514
Plaintiff:
DAVE DUNCOMBE
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARROLL et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2013cv05840
Plaintiff:
GEORGE IRA CARROLL , DAMOS CARTER , CHARLES RAY CARTER, SR. and others
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Carroll et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
as 3:2013cv00685
Plaintiff:
George Ira Carroll , Damos Carter , Charles Ray Carter, Sr. and others
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Carroll et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
as ILS/3:13-cv-00685
Plaintiff:
George Ira Carroll , Damos Carter , Charles Ray Carter, Sr. and others
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Fane Lozman v. City of Riviera Beach, et al
as 13-10252
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FANE LOZMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF RIVERA BEACH, a Florida municipal corporation, MICHAEL BROWN, an individual, GLORIA SHUTTLESWORTH, an individual and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
