Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Hugo Parker, LLP, et al v. Tate Andale, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv03029
Plaintiff:
Edward R. Hugo and Hugo Parker, LLP
Defendant:
William Tate , Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company and Tate Andale, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tate et al v. United States of America
as 3:2014cv00242
Plaintiff:
William Tate , Susie Sours , Cynthia Tate and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Corona v. Kozloff et al
as 3:2013cv00700
Plaintiff:
Daniel Corona
Defendant:
R. Kozloff, Darren Speice, William Tate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edward Finley v. Howard Skolnik, et al
as 13-16717
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD FINLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
HOWARD SKOLNIK, GREG COX, BRIAN WILLIAMS and others
William Tate v. Spirit Airlines, Inc.
as 13-13621
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM TATE
Defendant - Appellee:
SPIRIT AIRLINES, INC.
Tate v. Spirit Airlines, Inc.
as 0:2013cv60094
Plaintiff:
William Tate
Defendant:
Spirit Airlines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 0151 Railway Labor Act
James Tate, Jr. v. John Ault
as 12-2575
Petitioner - Appellant:
James William Tate, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee:
John Ault, Warden, Iowa State Penitentiary
Finley v. Skolnik et al
as 2:2010cv01782
Defendant:
Cheryl Burson, Greg Cox, Tanya Hill and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Finley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Tate et al v. Advanced Medical Optics, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv02790
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Tate and William Tate
Defendant:
Advanced Medical Optics, Inc. and Abbott Medical Optics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Tate v. Black Hawk County
as 6:2010cv02006
Plaintiff:
James William Tate, Jr
Defendant:
Black Hawk County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
