Cases 11 - 20 of 23
McCray v. Lewis
as 1:2016cv03855
Defendant:
Judge Yvonne Lewis
Plaintiff:
Joseph McCray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 5:2013cv31513
Plaintiff:
Yvonne Lewis and Steven Lewis
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Biton v. Washington Dulles Airport Auth
as 13-1181
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Danielle Biton, AKA Marcelle Bitton, AKA Crystal Bitton, AKA Danielle Bitton
Defendant - Appellee:
Washington Dulles Airport Authority, Kevin McKirgan, Ameena Meer and others
Biton v. Washington Dulles Airport Authority et al
as 1:2012cv05331
Defendant:
AFA, Admiral of the British Navy, Bain Capital and others
Plaintiff:
Danielle Biton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv05461
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-1336
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Aror O'Diah v. Corsi
as 10-2345
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Aror Ark O'Diah
Defendant - Appellee:
Denise A. Corsi, Appellate Advocates, Lynn W. L. Fahey and others
O'Diah v. Corsi et al
as 1:2010cv03437
Plaintiff:
Aror Ark O'Diah
Defendant:
Denise A. Corsi, Appellate Advocates, Lynn W.L. Fahey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simpkins v. Sontag et al
as 1:2010cv01554
Defendant:
Lilla Allocca, Lorraine Guzzo, Yvonne Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
LEWIS et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv91140
Plaintiff:
GARLAND E LEWIS, GARLAND E LEWIS, GARLAND E LEWIS and others
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., A.P. GREEN REFRACTORIES CO., ANCHOR PACKING CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
