Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 94
Schonberg v. Strulovich
as 17-3884
Plaintiff: Mike Genuth and Morris Karmel
Plaintiff - Appellant: Jacob Schonberg, Binyomin Schonberg, Raphael Barouch Elkaim and others
Defendant - Appellee: Yechezkel Strulovich, AKA Chaskiel Strulovitch, Yechiel Oberlander, AKA Mici Oberlander, 908 Bushwick Avenue LLC and others
Defendant: First Avenue Realty Holdings L.P. and 400 South 2nd Street Holdings L.P.
Jerry Mason v. Fremont Investment & Loan, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-10941
Plaintiff - Appellant: JERRY MASON
Defendant - Appellee: OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, L.L.C., a debt collector that acquired Fremont Investment & Loan, POWER DEFAULT SERVICES, INCORPORATED, a debt collector, MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATIONS SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED, (MERS) and others
United States of America v. All Rights To and Interests In The Shares of Flywheel Common Stock Held or Acquired by FW Sports Investments LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv04448
Defendant: All Rights To and Interests In The Shares of Flywheel Common Stock Held or Acquired by FW Sports Investments LLC
Plaintiff: United States of America
Clayton County, Georgia v. 0.24 acres of land (10,621.00 Sq. Ft.), more or less, lying in Land Lot 11 of the 12th District of Clayton County, Georgia to be acquired as a PERMANENT EASEMENT, being shown as (Permanent Easement Pa et al
as 1:2017cv00928
Plaintiff: Clayton County, Georgia
Defendant: 0.24 acres of land (10,621.00 Sq. Ft.), more or less, lying in Land Lot 11 of the 12th District of Clayton County, Georgia to be acquired as a PERMANENT EASEMENT, 0.17 acres of land (7,345.00 square feet), more or less, lying in Land Lots 11 and 22 of the 12th District of Clayton County Georgia, to be acquired as a PERMANENT EASEMENT, 0.073 acres of land (3,165.00 Sq. Ft.), more or less, lying in Land Lots 11 and 22 of the 12th District of Clayton County, Georgia to be acquired as a TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819
USA v. Low Peng, et al
as 17-55299
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Claimant - Appellant: LOW HOCK PENG, GOH GAIK EWE, LOW TAEK SZEN and others
Claimant - Appellee: SYMPHONY CP (PARK LANE) LLC, Potential Claimant and WG PARTNERS 36 CPS LLC, Potential Claimant
Defendant: ALL RIGHT TO AND INTEREST IN SYMPHONY CP PARK LANE LLC, Held or Acquired, directly or indirectly, by Symphony CP Investments LLC and/or Symphony CP Investments Holdings LLC, Including any Interested Held or Secured by The Real Proerty and Appurtenances Lo
Tom Harper, et al v. Conco, Inc. Employee Stock, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-6166
Debtor: In re: CONCO INC
Appellant: TOM HARPER, SANDRA KRUMMA, PEGGY SUE LEAKE and others
Appellee: CONCO, INC. EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN AND TRUST AGREEMENT, OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE and DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Polysonics Acquiring Corporation v. Spano
as 1:2016cv00274
Plaintiff: Polysonics Acquiring Corporation
Defendant: George Spano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv00125
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Type: Bankruptcy Appeal
Ron Rogers v. Penn Mutual Ins and Annuity Co
as 16-20097
Plaintiff - Appellant: RON ROGERS, asserting claims acquired from Charles Haden acquired pursuant to a turnover order
Defendant - Appellee: PENN MUTUAL INSURANCE AND ANNUITY COMPANY
Donahue v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AN ACQUIRER OF CERTAIN ASSETS AND LIABILITIES OF WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK FROM THE FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION ACTING AS RECEIVER et al
as 5:2015cv01888
Movant: Cari Donahue
Defendant: JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AN ACQUIRER OF CERTAIN ASSETS AND LIABILITIES OF WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK FROM THE FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION ACTING AS RECEIVER and Northwest Trustee Services Inc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?