Cases 11 - 20 of 332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01062
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00708
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
DOVEL v. LANCASTER COUNTY et al
as 2:2024cv00467
Plaintiff:
TAMALA KATHLEEN DOVEL
Defendant:
LANCASTER COUNTY, WARDEN PAUL SMEAL, CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS JOHN/JANE DOE#'S 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DOVEL v. LANCASTER COUNTY et al
as 5:2024cv00467
Plaintiff:
TAMALA KATHLEEN DOVEL
Defendant:
LANCASTER COUNTY, WARDEN PAUL SMEAL, CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS JOHN/JANE DOE#'S 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00681
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00617
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
COUCH v. TARGET CORPORATION et al
as 1:2024cv00473
Defendant:
TARGET CORPORATION, JANE/JOHN DOE(S) 1-10 and ABC CORP(S) 1-10
Plaintiff:
ANA COUCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00322
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00393
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
