Cases 11 - 20 of 37
THIBAULT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv02799
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL RAYMOND THIBAULT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Daniel Raymond Gallimore v. Unknown
as 8:2020cv02297
Plaintiff:
Daniel Raymond Gallimore
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00244
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Baca v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2020cv02255
Plaintiff:
Daniel Raymond Baca II and Daniel Raymond Baca, II
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and USAO-SS-Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
BOWSER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv38354
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL RAYMOND BOWSER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02305
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franchise Svc of North America v. United States Trustee, et al
as 18-60093
Appellant:
FRANCHISE SERVICES OF NORTH AMERICA, INCORPORATED
Appellee:
UNITED STATES TRUSTEE, MACQUARIE CAPITAL (USA), INCORPORATED, MICHAEL JOHN SILVERTON and others
STELZER v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2018cv00015
Plaintiff:
DANIEL RAYMOND STELZER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Daniel Longan v. Margaret Gilbert
as 17-35930
Petitioner - Appellant:
DANIEL RAYMOND LONGAN
Respondent - Appellee:
MARGARET GILBERT
SIERRA et al v. SCALCIONE et al
as 2:2017cv02546
Plaintiff:
DAVID SIERRA and DANIELLE RAYMOND
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICER SCALCIONE, POLICE OFFICER TULLO, POLICE OFFICER BADO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
