Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Ingris Hernandez-Vasquez, et al v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 18-70824
Petitioner:
INGRIS SELENA HERNANDEZ-VASQUEZ and ROMEL DAVID HERNANDEZ-VASQUEZ
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Alfaro-Vasquez v. Lynch et al
as 4:2016cv01554
Petitioner:
David Alfaro-Vasquez
Respondent:
Loretta E Lynch , Jeb Johnson , Juan P. Osuna and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv02435
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Alfaro-Vasquez v. Lynch et al
as 1:2016cv00422
Petitioner:
David Alfaro-Vasquez
Respondent:
Loretta E. Lynch , Jeb Johnson, Juan P. Osuna and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
David Alfaro-Vasquez v. Loretta Lynch
as 16-60147
Petitioner:
DAVID ALFARO-VASQUEZ, also known as Daniel Vasquez, also known as David Ernesto Vasquez, also known as David Alfaro, also known as David Vasquez
Respondent:
LORETTA LYNCH, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Joseph v. Barton et al
as 1:2012cv09437
Plaintiff:
Adriano Joseph
Defendant:
The City of New York , Andrew Barton, David J. Vasquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Muller v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv05825
Plaintiff:
Monaye Muller
Defendant:
The City of New York , David J. Vasquez, Andrew Barton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Monica Rosales, et al v. U.S. Attorney General
as 11-11062
Petitioner:
MONICA JOSEFINA ROSALES, ANDRES EDUARDO VASQUEZ, DAVID JAVIER VASQUEZ and others
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv04510
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
